Linnaeus has seen Joachim Fredrik Preisís Preis, Joachim Fredrik
(1667-1759). Swedish. Count and
diplomat. He served for 57 years as
secretary at the Swedish legation in The
Hague. Correspondent of Linnaeus. letter to Anders Johan von HöpkenHöpken, Anders Johan von
(1712-1789). Swedish. Count and
statesman. One of the founders of the
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.The
Chancellor of the Uppsala University
1760-1764. Correspondent of Linnaeus. , in which Preis reports that the Dutch government has refused Mårten KählerKähler, Mårten
(1728-1773). Swedish. Physician, orator
and poet. Studied under Linnaeus and
Nils Rosén von Rosenstein. Served
as physician of the admirality at
Karlskrona. Correspondent of Linnaeus. permission to go to the Cape of Good Hope region to collect plants.
Linnaeus lists several pupils who he has sent abroad. Pehr KalmKalm, Pehr (1716-1779).
Swedish. Botanist and traveller,
professor of natural history at
Åbo. Disciple of Linnaeus.
Travelled in North America 1748-1751.
Correspondent of Linnaeus. to Pennsylvania and Canada. He was favoured by both the British and the French governmen , and he returned home with a large collection of plants and descriptions.
After that Linnaeus sent Fredrik HasselquistHasselquist, Fredrik
(1722-1752). Swedish. Physician and
naturalist, explorer. Studied under
Linnaeus and Lars Roberg 1741-1749. Went
to Egypt, Syria, Palestine, Cyprus,
Rhodes and the island of Chios. Died
near Smyrna. Son of Magnus and Helena
Maria Hasselquist, brother of Andreas
Hasselquist. Correspondent of Linnaeus. to Egypt and Palestine; he was allowed to go between the two countries without problems. He died in Smyrna on his way back, his results are however valuable and still extant.
Pehr OsbeckOsbeck, Pehr (1723-1805).
Swedish. Clergyman, botanist explorer.
Studied at Uppsala under Linnaeus
1745-1750. Chaplain on ships of the
Swedish East India Company on voyages to
China. Vicar of Hasslöv (Halland).
Correspondent of Linnaeus. , Olof TorénTorén, Olof (1718-1753).
Swedish. Clergyman, naturalist.
Linnaeusís pupil. Went to China in
1748-1749 and to India and China in
1750-1752. Correspondent of Linnaeus. and Gad [Anders GaddGadd, Anders Swedish. ] were sent by Linnaeus to the East Indies, returning with varying collections.
The Spaniards even asked for a pupil of Linnaeus to come and work with them. He [Linnaeus refers to Pehr LöflingLöfling, Pehr (1729-1756).
Swedish. Botanist and explorer. Studied
under Linnaeus. Went to Spain in 1751
and took part in the Spanish expedition
to Venezuela in 1754, where he died.
Correspondent of Linnaeus. ] is still there, and he will be sent to their colonies [in South America] at their expense. So Linnaeus has not worked for himself but for the public; both the Dutch nation and Linnaeus have profited from these journeys, although the expense has been covered from Sweden.
So Linnaeus had really not expected a refusal from the Dutch regarding Kähler. All he wanted was permission to go there and gather innocent flowers and insects in the wilderness, and Linnaeus thought nobody would refuse that, except maybe the Japanese. It was the more surprising, as the Dutch have contributed so much to science. However, times change, and science follows the political circumstances.
Linnaeus does not want Preis to try to have the issue reassessed. Linnaeus has managed to get money for Kähler to go, and he will go, but Linnaeus will send him to another country in Africa. It does not matter where he goes.
However, Linnaeus does ask Preis to obtain a formal document from the government containing this refusal, a testimony for the future. Thus, nobody can question Linnaeusís care for Kähler, and those who do not think this could happen will have it manifestly documented.
This would be very gratifying both to Linnaeus and to all lovers of science.